|
By: Paul S Cilwa |
Posted: 4/28/2006 |
|
Page Views: 4,654 |
| Hashtags: #Politics #Immigration |
| What's wrong with singing the National Anthem in Spanish? Don't you know the English words already? |
| Estimated reading time: 3 minute(s) (563 words) |
This is such a catastrophe that President Bush took time out of his busy
day—and he's very busy these days, what with plummeting approval poll ratings,
the fact that twice as many soldiers have been killed in Iraq this month as in
March, Karl Rove's imminent indictment for perjury, his second attempt at
involving the Saudi-owned Dubai Corporation into our defense infrastructure, and
personally helping, with New Orleans Mayor Nagin, to rebuild homes destroyed by
Hurricane Katrina—he took time out to
express his opinion that the National Anthem be sung "only in English."
"One of the things that's very important is, when we debate this
issue, that we not lose our national soul…I think people who want to be
citizens of this country ought to learn English," Bush said.
President Bush's statement ignores the estimated 8.6% of
Americans who are deaf, and therefore express the National Anthem
(beautifully, I might add) in American Sign Language. It ignores the
fact that the National Anthem has for years been sung in the various
other languages spoken by our diverse, multi-cultural
culture—for example, in
Navajo.
As for the "national soul," the music of the National Anthem was borrowed
from a British drinking song. And its lyrics never once mention the name of the
country. It is, instead, a song celebrating our tenacity in battle. That
tenacity was won through the efforts of American soldiers: Some who spoke
English, yes, but others whose native language was Navajo, Irish, French,
Polish, Bantu, and others. Our "national soul" is the spirit of
diversity; and it is President Bush—and others whose prejudices he echoes—who
violates that soul by insisting only English-speakers give voice to it.
Singing is a communication of the heart. Regardless of the lyrics or the
language in which they are sung, the singing voice expresses what words never
can. In the case of the National Anthem, that is the joy of discovering freedom
and the triumph of retaining it against all odds. This is not an emotion to
which English speakers have copyright.
Meanwhile, in bringing up the issue of "national soul," President Bush misses
the fact that we'd already lost our national soul when we discovered our own
soldiers have been torturing prisoners in violation of the Geneva Convention and
our own sense of ethics; that we held such prisoners incommunicado without due
process; that our own president had broken the law by listening into our private
conversations without warrant. President Bush allows himself to be photographed
in New Orleans, hammering nails into a building frame. Why was he there? Does
anyone really think that the time of the President of the United States
is best spent hammering on the frame of one building when the moral foundation
of our nation is falling apart?
That photo is, in fact, a visual lie from an Administration of lies, like the
one about Weapons of Mass Destruction that tricked us into attacking Iraq and
losing so many American soldiers, not to mention hundreds of thousands of Iraqi
civilians.
When a Spanish-speaker sings "Amanece: ?no veis, a la luz de la aurora,"
he or she is singing truth. I'd rather have the truth in Spanish, than another
lie in English, any day.